Brand sentiment without the vanity score
A score like “82% positive” feels good and tells you little. What AI assistants actually say about your brand, the facts they get wrong and the doubts they repeat, is where the useful work is.
Most AI visibility tools classify how assistants describe your brand: positive, neutral, negative, sometimes mixed. Averaged up, that becomes a sentiment score. It is a reasonable alarm bell. It is a poor guide to what to do next.
How tools sort descriptions
| Tool | Categories or measure |
|---|---|
| Scrunch | Positive, Mixed, Negative, Missing (when tone can’t be determined) |
| OtterlyAI | The balance between positive and negative references |
| Semrush AI Visibility | Overall sentiment: the balance of positive and general sentiment in mentions |
| Peec AI | Positive, neutral or negative descriptions |
Note the small differences. Some tools have a “mixed” bucket for answers that praise one thing and criticise another; others force a single label. Some count answers where tone is unclear; others leave them out. As with every metric in this category, a sentiment percentage from one tool isn’t directly comparable with another’s.
Why the score flatters
An answer that recommends a brand will, almost by definition, describe it in neutral or positive terms. So a brand that is recommended often can show healthy sentiment even when something important in those answers is wrong. The useful signal is usually in the detail, not the average.
What the score shows
- The overall tone of mentions
- Big shifts after bad news
- Tone versus rivals, roughly
What it hides
- Wrong facts stated politely
- Old prices, features or names
- The one doubt repeated in every answer
Read for four things instead
A spreadsheet with those four columns, filled from a dozen real answers, is often more useful than a year of sentiment charts. Some tools now help directly: Waikay, for instance, lists fact checking and topic analysis, and says it uncovers hallucinations and missing knowledge.
From description to action
- CollectTen to twenty answers that mention you, from the platforms that matter.
- TagAccuracy errors, positioning, objections, comparisons.
- TraceCheck the cited pages for where each claim comes from.
- Fix the sourceUpdate your pages, correct listings, answer the objection publicly.
Step three links sentiment to citations: wrong facts usually come from somewhere, and the cited page is the first place to look.
Sources
- Scrunch: Metrics guide viewed 11 Nov 2026
- OtterlyAI: Brand report KPI definitions viewed 11 Nov 2026
- Semrush: AI SEO metrics viewed 11 Nov 2026
- Peec AI documentation: brand metrics viewed 11 Nov 2026
- Waikay viewed 11 Nov 2026
Directory figures come from Hyperfind’s profiles of 34 tools, not the whole market. Prices follow each provider’s published offer on the date shown in its profile.

