Measurement

What an AI visibility tool actually measures

Strip away the dashboards and every tool is counting the same few things in an AI answer. Here is the anatomy, and the questions to ask about each number.

Open any AI visibility dashboard and you will meet a wall of numbers: visibility, share of voice, position, sentiment, citations. They look like five different measurements. Most of them come from one source, the saved answers, read in different ways.

Every one of these tools does the same basic job. It sends a set of questions (the industry calls them prompts) to AI assistants such as ChatGPT, Gemini or Perplexity, saves the answers, and then reads each answer looking for your brand. Everything on the dashboard comes from what it finds in those saved answers.

So the most useful thing you can do before comparing tools is learn to see the answer underneath the number.

The anatomy of one answer

Here is what a tool is looking at when it scores a single response. The question and brands are made up; the parts are the ones every tool measures.

One saved answer, and the five things a tool reads from it

A made-up AI answer to the question "What's a good accounting app for a small bakery?" naming three brands in order. Numbered markers show the context, the mention, the position, the description and a cited source, each explained on the right. Prompt · ChatGPT · 11 Nov · United States “What’s a good accounting app for a bakery?” (made up) AI answer 1. Brand A is often recommended for small food businesses: simple invoices, friendly support. Source: a software review site 2. Brand B suits shops that also sell online. 3. Brand C is cheaper, but some owners find setup confusing. 1 2 3 4 5 1 ContextPlatform, date, country 2 MentionIs the brand named at all? 3 PositionFirst, second, third… 4 DescriptionHow it is described 5 CitationWhich pages back the answer
Made-up example. Real answers vary in length and format, and many contain no sources at all.

Count mentions across many answers and you get visibility. Compare your mentions with rivals’ and you get share of voice. Average the order and you get position. Classify the descriptions and you get sentiment. Count the pages and you get citations. Each tool then wraps these in its own names and formulas.

Same idea, different sums

The words are shared across the category. The arithmetic is not. Here is how five tools define “visibility” or its closest equivalent in their own help pages:

ToolTheir main presence measureWhat is actually counted
OtterlyAIBrand coverageShare of prompt checks (each prompt, on each platform, each day) that mention the brand
ScrunchBrand presenceShare of AI responses that name the brand
Ahrefs Brand RadarMentions and impressionsAnswers naming the brand, weighted by Google search volume for impressions
Semrush AI VisibilityAI VisibilityA 0–100 benchmark score against competitors
Peec AIVisibilityHow often the brand is mentioned across responses
Wording summarised from each provider’s help pages, viewed 11 November 2026. Follow the sources at the end for the exact definitions.

Notice the units. Some tools count every answer, some count each prompt on each platform per day, and a weighted measure like Ahrefs’ impressions deliberately gives popular questions more say. None of these is wrong. They answer different questions, which is why a “35%” in one tool and a “35%” in another are not the same thing.

TakeawayWhen a vendor shows you a percentage, ask one question: “Percentage of what?” Prompts, responses, or search-volume weighted impressions. The answer tells you whether two tools can be compared at all.

Five questions to ask about any number

  1. Which answers?Which platforms, how many runs, which country and language.
  2. Counted how?Per prompt, per response, or weighted.
  3. Against whom?Share of voice depends entirely on the rival list you set.
  4. How many samples?Small samples swing; good tools show the count.
  5. Can I see the answer?The saved text is the evidence behind the score.

The last question matters most. Scrunch’s guide, for example, shows the sample behind a rate, such as “43% (37 of 86 responses)”. That kind of detail turns a number you have to trust into one you can check.

What none of these numbers tell you

An AI visibility score measures what an assistant said in the answers a tool collected. It does not tell you how many people asked that question, whether anyone clicked, or whether the answer changed a purchase. Some tools add search volume or website traffic data to get closer to that, and they label it. Treat everything else as a well-organised sample of AI answers. It is still very useful, as long as you read it that way.

Our guide to reading AI visibility results covers the evidence behind the numbers. If you want to go one level deeper, our pieces on citations, share of voice and reading week-to-week change take each measure apart in turn.

Sources

  1. OtterlyAI: Brand report KPI definitions viewed 11 Nov 2026
  2. Ahrefs: AI visibility metrics viewed 11 Nov 2026
  3. Semrush: AI SEO metrics viewed 11 Nov 2026
  4. Scrunch: Metrics guide viewed 11 Nov 2026
  5. Peec AI documentation: brand metrics viewed 11 Nov 2026

Directory figures come from Hyperfind’s profiles of 34 tools, not the whole market. Prices follow each provider’s published offer on the date shown in its profile.

Tools in this story

Price your workload ↗Compare tools ↗

Keep reading

Measurement

Citations: the pages behind the answer

A mention tells you an assistant named you. A citation tells you which page convinced it. For most teams, the citation list is the most actionable thing an AI visibility tool produces.

Measurement

Trend or wobble? Reading week-to-week movement

Your visibility fell from 40% to 30%. Panic, or shrug? A simple rule based on how many answers sit behind the number, with a worked example and a chart you can keep beside your dashboard.

ChartDecision tree
Measurement

Share of voice: one phrase, three different sums

Two tools can show the same brands with opposite winners, and both be right. A four-prompt worked example shows how coverage, mention share and search-weighted share of voice can rank rivals in reverse.

ChartDecision treeWorked example